Wednesday, March 5, 2014

UNESCO link to Common Core

Parents may want to know that the education our keki are receiving, in public schools today, comes directly from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO.) This U.N. education flows through a variety of domestic channels, to give the impression that it is a "state-led" program. This U.N. education is currently called Common Core State Standards.  

Perhaps the most blatant connection between UNESCO and Common Core can be summed up in one word: "Microsoft." (...if that's a word.) Or in two words: "Bill Gates." 

Mr. Gates, global philanthropist, maintains a "Cooperation Agreement" [Pdf.] with UNESCO to further that organization's educational agendas. This contract between Microsoft and UNESCO clarifies:

"Microsoft supports the objectives of UNESCO as stipulated in UNESCO's Constitution and intends to contribute to UNESCO's programme priorities."

Meanwhile, The  Gates Foundation is the lead financier of education in the United States. Most, if not all, education in the United States is aligned with Common Core.  Hawaii is no exception. Students in both public and private schools in Hawaii are receiving educations that further UNESCO's "programme priorities." 
--------------------------
U.N. Agenda 21--Chapter 36 on Education
Promoting Education, Public Awareness And Training: 
http://www.un-documents.net/a21-36.htm


"Governments should strive to update or prepare strategies aimed at integrating environment and development as a cross-cutting issue into education at all levels within the next three years. This should be done in cooperation with all sectors of society. The strategies should set out policies and activities, and identify needs, cost, means and schedules for their implementation, evaluation and review. A thorough review of curricula should be undertaken to ensure a multidisciplinary approach, with environment and development issues and their socio-cultural and demographic aspects and linkages. Due respect should be given to community-defined needs and diverse knowledge systems, including science, cultural and social sensitivities;"
------------------------
While we're at it

Saturday, February 15, 2014

THE OAHU LANDS JUGGLING ACT

Welcome to Agenda 21

There is a certain SB 3065 in the current Legislature having to do with "LAND EXCHANGE." This is a 3-part bill; and we might easily call it "THE OAHU LANDS JUGGLING ACT." The three parts follow as thus:
Part I: Authorizes the State to exchange lands for certain agricultural and conservation lands owned by Dole Food Company, Inc. 
Part II: Expands the Kalaeloa community development district. 
Part III: Establishes the Whitmore project facility revenue bond special fund into which proceeds from revenue bonds shall be deposited for purchasing certain parcels of land from Dole Food Company, Inc. Appropriates funds to acquire certain Dole Food lands. 

SB 3065 is spearheaded by Donovan Dela Cruz, making it suspect from the start. Though, to the untrained eye, the bill seems innocent and well-intended enough. One might even be fooled into thinking that the good senator has turned over a new leaf [this election year] and is actually doing something beneficial for the state. 

Yet, to the experienced conspiracy theorist, this bill stinks to high heaven of Agenda 21. This second paragraph is a dead giveaway. You hardly need to read any further:

"The legislature further finds that there is a continuing need to protect and preserve unique natural assets, both for the enjoyment of future generations and to establish base lines for environmental impact. The present system of preserves, sanctuaries, and refuges must be strengthened, and additional areas of land suitable for agriculture and preservation should be set aside. These additional areas of land may contain rare species of plants and animals, portions of the State's major watershed areas, and prime agricultural lands."

If this paragraph seems innocuous to you, then you need to brush up on Agenda 21--The United Nations plan for global sustainable development; including The Wildlands Project.  
There are many on-line sources  to explore. You can get a quick A-21 summery here:


You might not believe everything in this presentation, but please hear it out. And ask yourself, "What if only half the information presented here is true? Would it be OK?" *

My thought is that this U.N. Agenda 21 may be twice as sinister as this slide presentation describes. If you let your imagination run for awhile, you might come to the same conclusions that I have. 

Buffer Zones.
The buffer zones, as found in the Wildlands scheme to protect bio diversity, are not clearly defined in SB 3065. But they are subtlety there--hiding in plain sight:

"The present system of preserves, sanctuaries, and refuges must be strengthened,..."


That "strengthening" will arrive in later bills, maybe next year--after the election--when everybody doesn't have to be on their best behavior. Here, the strengthening bit will be better defined; and we will see the words:
 "BUFFER ZONE."!
---------------
More resources:
* Agenda 21 Explained--full version  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GykzQWlXJs

Democrats Against Agenda 21
http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/

UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Information Hawaiian Islands

Senator Laura Thielen does a run down on this bill, SB5065, on her blog, here.  (See Contest and Contest Updates...it starts here. ) A surprise ending comes with the Attorney Genera'ls testimony.

 Video on Agenda 21, Wildlands and More: